My commitment is to creating the european central bank. Our team is committed to delivering outstanding customer service. Is a commitment in the general area, not a commitment to.</p> Did a quick search but came up empty. However, i have come across, much less frequently, be (jointly) committed to do sth or.
A promise to involve oneself in something i think this is true. 'have a commitment ' +to infinitive: Could you help me, please? I've read these two sentences among the examples provided by wordreference: I rather suspect this flies in the face of normal usage.
My commitment is to creating the european central bank. Our team is committed to delivering outstanding customer service. Is a commitment in the general area, not a commitment to.</p> Did a quick search but came up empty. However, i have come across, much less frequently, be (jointly) committed to do sth or.
A promise to involve oneself in something i think this is true. 'have a commitment ' +to infinitive: Could you help me, please? I've read these two sentences among the examples provided by wordreference: I rather suspect this flies in the face of normal usage.
So, let me ask that. There's nothing wrong with your sentence, but i think i would say i appreciate your offer but, unfortunately, i can't accept as i already have other commitments. She is committed to her family) where sth may be a gerund (e.g. 'have a commitment to' + gerund: My commitment is to create the european central bank.
In business contexts commitment on is often used. The maastricht treaty contained a commitment to create the european central bank. I'm sure there is a difference, but i'm struggling to explain what it the difference, but i am sure there is one. But, reading the dictionary, i came across one thing that i don't understand. She is committed to looking.
The ministry of foreign affairs of malaysia is committed to providing consular services to malaysian overseas We normally say sb is committed to sth (e.g. They are committed to keep their word. 2. My ear says #2 sounds better. The maastricht treaty contained a commitment to creating the european central bank.
There's nothing wrong with your sentence, but i think i would say i appreciate your offer but, unfortunately, i can't accept as i already have other commitments. She is committed to her family) where sth may be a gerund (e.g. 'have a commitment to' + gerund: My commitment is to create the european central bank.
The maastricht treaty contained a commitment to create the european central bank. I'm sure there is a difference, but i'm struggling to explain what it the difference, but i am sure there is one. But, reading the dictionary, i came across one thing that i don't understand. She is committed to looking after her family).
We normally say sb is committed to sth (e.g. They are committed to keep their word. 2. My ear says #2 sounds better. The maastricht treaty contained a commitment to creating the european central bank.
Hi there, i'm not sure which one is correct when i use commitment, whether commitment to doing something or commitment to do something? Our team is committed to deliver outstanding customer service. I think a commitment on is less significant than a commitment to.