It was him who messed up everything. I know there are different opinions on this issue. What is the difference between these two sentences? In the tv show family guy, the character peter says that he is not partial to the movie godfather, and he says the reason is that the movie "insists upon itself". But these days i'm observing the usage of the above sentence (especially in american movies) like this,.
That is, you and i, he and i, billy, joe, and i can all use the pronoun our in order to describe the possessive. If the subject determine which one is correct depending on plural/singular how come these contradict each other: Why is it this is he rather than this is him? This rule doesn't work generally, therefore it can hardly be. What is the difference between “speaking” and “talking”?
It was him who messed up everything. I know there are different opinions on this issue. What is the difference between these two sentences? In the tv show family guy, the character peter says that he is not partial to the movie godfather, and he says the reason is that the movie "insists upon itself". But these days i'm observing.
That is, you and i, he and i, billy, joe, and i can all use the pronoun our in order to describe the possessive. If the subject determine which one is correct depending on plural/singular how come these contradict each other: Why is it this is he rather than this is him? This rule doesn't work generally, therefore it can.
It was he who messed up everything. I'm often befuddled when i am reading an article and the author uses talked with when referring to a conversation. 'he relies on her', 'i rely on her', 'you rely on her', 'our car. Grammatically, for he/she/it we use does or doesn't like in, he doesn't eat meat.
But he's an apple can be mistaken for he is an apple, while he has an apple might be intended. [duplicate] ask question asked 13 years, 11 months ago modified 13 years, 11 months ago