I am interested in the professor sounds like the professor is not consciously doing anything to spark your interest, therefore, you take interest in him. “interested in” gets 23703 results and “interested on” gets only 13. But few people would say it in conversation. I am interested to know if, for some, there is a subtle difference between the two phrases in the title. In addition to ws2's answer, i would like to add that interested by can be used when a certain object or person can somewhat actively interest you:
The company wants to understand the customer’s interested product. In some other cases, like this and this, interest (ed) towards is used in some situations where it is effectively interchangeable with interest (ed) in. The to is actually part of the verb that comes after it, like in to read, to see, or to hear. 1 saving the planet is the topic in which i am interested the most is perfectly grammatical, and most people use in which in that way in a formal context like a report or an essay. To sum it up, you are interested in something, interested to do something, but most likely won't be interested towards something.
I am interested in the professor sounds like the professor is not consciously doing anything to spark your interest, therefore, you take interest in him. “interested in” gets 23703 results and “interested on” gets only 13. But few people would say it in conversation. I am interested to know if, for some, there is a subtle difference between the two.
The company wants to understand the customer’s interested product. In some other cases, like this and this, interest (ed) towards is used in some situations where it is effectively interchangeable with interest (ed) in. The to is actually part of the verb that comes after it, like in to read, to see, or to hear. 1 saving the planet is.
A would be a perfectly good sentence here. Interested to interested to is a bit more complicated, because by itself it doesn't really make sense. The professor interests me because of his lecture (, so i am interested by him) but: Of the two examples now provided in the question, only the first is correct. If you say i'm interested,.
However, here, the rule is put in the different prepositions: You can check questions like this using the corpus of contemporary american english. I am equally interested in knowing if there is a subtle difference. This to form of the verb is known as the infinitive, and is used to add detail to (or modify) the word that comes before.
Not a daft question, as english sometimes has rules (or perhaps they'd be better called conventions) as to which other 'rule' to break when it's almost impossible (or very inconvenient) not to. If you say i'd be interested, what is implied is i'd be interested if you were to tell me, which i'm not telling you to do. I reckon.
Interested to interested to is a bit more complicated, because by itself it doesn't really make sense. The professor interests me because of his lecture (, so i am interested by him) but: Of the two examples now provided in the question, only the first is correct. If you say i'm interested, you're directly stating that you want to know the information.
You can check questions like this using the corpus of contemporary american english. I am equally interested in knowing if there is a subtle difference. This to form of the verb is known as the infinitive, and is used to add detail to (or modify) the word that comes before it. Agree that interest with doesn't sound fluent, but you do see some examples online of people saying that informally.
If you say i'd be interested, what is implied is i'd be interested if you were to tell me, which i'm not telling you to do. I reckon this is a typo in the answer key.