The legal secretary wrote, “.order modifying child support using the parties’ actual income.” is this correct? Sure, but op is literally asking: Using it instead of he/she or they in legal contracts/agreements dear forumers! I don't even want to. I am at the party.
Not being able to backup your save data (only cloud), sub par performance for 3rd party game, worse battery life compared to oled switch, expensive games, expensive online subscription. Now when ms went third party: Most of the literature on the subject suggests using he, he/she, or they. It's upto the developer to choose, not sony or ms. 7 years ago the switch is attractive because of the portability, but now that steam deck or ally x already existed, switch 2 is trash because of all the above.
The legal secretary wrote, “.order modifying child support using the parties’ actual income.” is this correct? Sure, but op is literally asking: Using it instead of he/she or they in legal contracts/agreements dear forumers! I don't even want to. I am at the party.
Especially since they are getting even more expensive over time. Does it still make sense for sony to produce consoles at all? which is hilarious as the console, more than the games, is the main thing making them more money than ever. Hi, i couldn't grasp the difference between 'at the party' and 'in the party', could you please tell me? Indie developers don't have the luxury to skip a huge potential revenue stream, like rockstar or activision.
I am in the party. In a legal document, i am referred to as a “party” in some instances. Not even most 3rd party devs do that these days, that's why you see pc ports from most devs today, which was once upon a time, an afterthought. Since some sony first party games now cost 200 to 300 million to develop and most live service games from sony have failed (except for helldivers 2) does it still make sense for sony to produce consoles at all?