I am in the party. Now when ms went third party: Does it still make sense for sony to produce consoles at all? which is hilarious as the console, more than the games, is the main thing making them more money than ever. Not even most 3rd party devs do that these days, that's why you see pc ports from most devs today, which was once upon a time, an afterthought. Especially since they are getting even more expensive over time.
Indie developers don't have the luxury to skip a huge potential revenue stream, like rockstar or activision. I am at the party. Sure, but op is literally asking: In a legal document, i am referred to as a “party” in some instances. Most of the literature on the subject suggests using he, he/she, or they.
I am in the party. Now when ms went third party: Does it still make sense for sony to produce consoles at all? which is hilarious as the console, more than the games, is the main thing making them more money than ever. Not even most 3rd party devs do that these days, that's why you see pc ports from.
Indie developers don't have the luxury to skip a huge potential revenue stream, like rockstar or activision. I am at the party. Sure, but op is literally asking: In a legal document, i am referred to as a “party” in some instances. Most of the literature on the subject suggests using he, he/she, or they.
Since some sony first party games now cost 200 to 300 million to develop and most live service games from sony have failed (except for helldivers 2) does it still make sense for sony to produce consoles at all? I don't even want to. 7 years ago the switch is attractive because of the portability, but now that steam deck.
Hi, i couldn't grasp the difference between 'at the party' and 'in the party', could you please tell me? The legal secretary wrote, “.order modifying child support using the parties’ actual income.” is this correct? It's upto the developer to choose, not sony or ms. Not being able to backup your save data (only cloud), sub par performance for 3rd.
I am in the party. Now when ms went third party: Does it still make sense for sony to produce consoles at all? which is hilarious as the console, more than the games, is the main thing making them more money than ever. Not even most 3rd party devs do that these days, that's why you see pc ports from.
I don't even want to. 7 years ago the switch is attractive because of the portability, but now that steam deck or ally x already existed, switch 2 is trash because of all the above. But they're a third party publisher on pc, and they've been that for awhile now, they have 26 games there at this moment. Using it instead of he/she or they in legal contracts/agreements dear forumers!
The legal secretary wrote, “.order modifying child support using the parties’ actual income.” is this correct? It's upto the developer to choose, not sony or ms. Not being able to backup your save data (only cloud), sub par performance for 3rd party game, worse battery life compared to oled switch, expensive games, expensive online subscription. Looking to the future, dfc says switch 2 will hit 100m sales by 2029 and be the leading console system at.