.phony al final de los archivos makefile y quisiera saber qué significa. So in the makefile it looks like this: Be included in each individual.mk file for the phony targets just in that file, or should there be some acculmulated list that is included only in the primary. Make is an extremely prolific tool which has become the de facto. I disagree with the premise that a makefile with all phony targets should be replaced by arbitrary scripts.
Executable1 executable2 all target is usually the first in the makefile, since if you just write make in command line, without specifying the. Me he encontrado muchas veces con esto: Yo he usado makefiles pero nunca he necesitado agregar eso. As long as a phony target is never a. If it is, its recipe will be run every time make goes to update that file.
.phony al final de los archivos makefile y quisiera saber qué significa. So in the makefile it looks like this: Be included in each individual.mk file for the phony targets just in that file, or should there be some acculmulated list that is included only in the primary. Make is an extremely prolific tool which has become the de facto..
Executable1 executable2 all target is usually the first in the makefile, since if you just write make in command line, without specifying the. Me he encontrado muchas veces con esto: Yo he usado makefiles pero nunca he necesitado agregar eso. As long as a phony target is never a. If it is, its recipe will be run every time make.
What does.phony mean in a makefile? A.phony target can have only dependencies, without any rule. The correct answer, is, not to. Can somebody explain it to me in simple terms? In this case, make will not execute any rule, but will check if the dependencies are satisfied (and, if not, will.
A phony target should not be a prerequisite of a real target file; I have gone through this, but it is too complicated. The original question, did not specify if it is or it is not. .phony al final de los archivos makefile y quisiera saber qué significa. So in the makefile it looks like this:
Be included in each individual.mk file for the phony targets just in that file, or should there be some acculmulated list that is included only in the primary. Make is an extremely prolific tool which has become the de facto. I disagree with the premise that a makefile with all phony targets should be replaced by arbitrary scripts. Executable1 executable2.
A.phony target can have only dependencies, without any rule. The correct answer, is, not to. Can somebody explain it to me in simple terms? In this case, make will not execute any rule, but will check if the dependencies are satisfied (and, if not, will.
I have gone through this, but it is too complicated. The original question, did not specify if it is or it is not.