The hp1 and hp2 don't use updated circuitry like the x36 line. The need for simulcast also goes well beyond any cost of licensing (government agencies are exempt from. Several suggestions are in the wiki article on simulcast. I've tried the hp1/2 and they don't handle. One might work, or may not.
For simulcast systems they will transmit all conversations on all sites so in that case you only need to scan one single site, the one with the best signal strength. None of the sites for your county (lee) on the system are tagged as simulcast, but the site map for site 2 shows signs that it might be simulcast. Both units have faithfully ticked away. I've begun to observe odd behavior involving both the 100 and 200. In a properly engineered simulcast system this isn't really the case.
The hp1 and hp2 don't use updated circuitry like the x36 line. The need for simulcast also goes well beyond any cost of licensing (government agencies are exempt from. Several suggestions are in the wiki article on simulcast. I've tried the hp1/2 and they don't handle. One might work, or may not.
For simulcast systems they will transmit all conversations on all sites so in that case you only need to scan one single site, the one with the best signal strength. None of the sites for your county (lee) on the system are tagged as simulcast, but the site map for site 2 shows signs that it might be simulcast. Both.
Of the choices you mentioned, the 436/536 win by a long shot. I mostly monitor 800mhz simulcast on a major system in my city. Simulcast systems must control the phase of the rf(using a very accurate time source like gps), so that with in the intended coverage of the simulcast system, the signals. The hp1 and hp2 don't use updated.
Several suggestions are in the wiki article on simulcast. I've tried the hp1/2 and they don't handle. One might work, or may not. For simulcast systems they will transmit all conversations on all sites so in that case you only need to scan one single site, the one with the best signal strength. None of the sites for your county.
Both units have faithfully ticked away. I've begun to observe odd behavior involving both the 100 and 200. In a properly engineered simulcast system this isn't really the case. Of the choices you mentioned, the 436/536 win by a long shot. I mostly monitor 800mhz simulcast on a major system in my city.
I mostly monitor 800mhz simulcast on a major system in my city. Simulcast systems must control the phase of the rf(using a very accurate time source like gps), so that with in the intended coverage of the simulcast system, the signals.