How to templatize code for a class member function based on constructor parameter asked 5 years, 7 months ago modified 5 years, 7 months ago viewed 69 times Iostream or fstream asked 14 years ago modified 14 years ago viewed 2k times Or is it inherently too specific to be templated? In c++11, is there a way to template a lambda function? Turns out someone already had that same idea here] which can determine a value at compile time.
When declaring a template, i am used to having this kind of code: I checked that it compiles. I understand that i can define a classic templated class/functor. In particular, you can't use operators like > between generic type values, because the compiler doesn't know about. 3 i would like to templatize first type of std::pair using the following construction template struct tpair { typedef std::pair <t, short> type;
How to templatize code for a class member function based on constructor parameter asked 5 years, 7 months ago modified 5 years, 7 months ago viewed 69 times Iostream or fstream asked 14 years ago modified 14 years ago viewed 2k times Or is it inherently too specific to be templated? In c++11, is there a way to template a.
When declaring a template, i am used to having this kind of code: I checked that it compiles. I understand that i can define a classic templated class/functor. In particular, you can't use operators like > between generic type values, because the compiler doesn't know about. 3 i would like to templatize first type of std::pair using the following construction.
There's a variation i made up some time ago [edit: But in this question, they used: If you have a templated class or a templated function, (or combination of the two), how do you bind that function, (preserving the template type parameter)? However, this is brittle, and doesn't cover every possible usage. How to templatize c++ constructor for perfect forwarding.
How to templatize code for a class member function based on constructor parameter asked 5 years, 7 months ago modified 5 years, 7 months ago viewed 69 times Iostream or fstream asked 14 years ago modified 14 years ago viewed 2k times Or is it inherently too specific to be templated? In c++11, is there a way to template a.
When declaring a template, i am used to having this kind of code: I checked that it compiles. I understand that i can define a classic templated class/functor. In particular, you can't use operators like > between generic type values, because the compiler doesn't know about. 3 i would like to templatize first type of std::pair using the following construction.
But in this question, they used: If you have a templated class or a templated function, (or combination of the two), how do you bind that function, (preserving the template type parameter)? However, this is brittle, and doesn't cover every possible usage. How to templatize c++ constructor for perfect forwarding asked 9 years, 8 months ago modified 9 years, 8 months ago viewed 978 times